🔗 Share this article

This is Black History Month in the UK, and it seems it’s time for a reassessment. Over the years, an event that was initiated as a commemorative event of heritage, traditions and links between international African diaspora communities, has developed a commercial tone, growing to encompass gatherings where individuals of African heritage are compensated to talk to Caucasian groups about implicit prejudice and active solidarity. The demonstrations for racial justice in the 2020s created a surge in the industry of demonstrating racial awareness. But even that moment has passed. The surge has reached its height, resulting in a somewhat empty inheritance of what raising awareness is for.

The Origins of Black History Month

Initially celebrated in the United States and Canada, Black History Month was created in 1962 as a week dedicated to Negro history by Black scholar Carter G. Woodson with multiple days of remembrance and recognition in the middle of February. Black History Month developed from this campaign and was publicly established in 1970. Today it is observed not only in the North America in February, but also in October in the Britain, the Federal Republic of Germany, Ireland and the Netherlands.

The observance has evolved since those days, giving reduced attention to the narratives of colonial slavery and civil rights battles, and greater focus on prominent Black figures in government, the arts, and social movements, and extensively acknowledging the input Black people have made to influence the nation. It is in learning environments where Black History Month is most commonly celebrated, with discussions and heritage festivities. But the method the observance is observed is a reflection of the contemporary political context. How it develops is a instructive case in how assimilation leads to weakening: the reshaping of Black History Month has impeded the purpose of it, which is to confront structural and organizational discrimination.

---

A Disconcerting Period

Few things illustrate how crucial it is to rethink Black History Month more than the particular moment in which it occurs this year. In the UK, a revitalized conservative movement in the shape of the Reform party is leading the polls. In the recent season we observed the largest far-right rally in the UK's past. the Conservative leader, the Black leader of the Conservative party, is a staunch adversary of Black Lives Matter, and we are in a position where a member of parliament gains confidence to declare that “not seeing any white faces” in specific city neighborhoods is a cause for alarm. Meanwhile, ultra-nationalist movements are surging in Europe as a whole.

In the US, a significant offensive against DEI and affirmative action has been taken, repeatedly with positive outcomes, to the top legal institutions of the state. A campaign to erase African American heritage and experience from the archives is ongoing. One of Donald Trump's initial presidential directives aimed at the institution dedicated to Black heritage, and the Smithsonian Institution, accusing them of a coordinated and broad attempt to rewrite our Nation’s history” by representing the nation “as inherently racist”.

In this context, the observance symbolises how little it can be influential if it is confined to either dutiful corporate observances, or depoliticized commemorations of historical achievements, rather than addressing the situation of the current era. It also reveals how its limited duration means that it is detached from the wider consistent effort that is required. A university professor, a educator at University of Greenwich, expressed it perfectly when she voiced worries about the short-term symbolic gestures of the month. “The issue with taking a tokenistic approach”, she commented, “is that it typically leads to that Black History Month evolves into a fleeting performance rather than a driver of transformation.”

---

Rethinking, But Not Jettisoning

Figuring out how to alter, change and broaden efforts for fair treatment and appreciation in such times of discouragement and concern is a challenging endeavor. There is a temptation to just do away with observances such as Black History Month entirely, assuming they are inadequate for current needs, or are relics of an time that has failed to deliver.

But despite everything, Black History Month, and in fact the whole broad system and heritage of racial movements – local anti-racism groups, diversity equity and inclusion initiatives, and yes, even those talks to businesses – represent an infrastructure that a significant effort has been invested in. It is there not only to deteriorate as the politics moves on (and in fact, regresses), but to be a dynamic entity.

So what would a new dynamic Black History Month appear as? Well, first, it would be extended beyond a brief observance: something that is dispersed throughout the annual calendar (as some institutions are already beginning to do), elements of its material (particularly around prominent figures of color) included in academic syllabi. It would also be a era that does not evade political issues, and provides room for citizens, particularly young people, to air their fears and experiences. What use is mere awareness of the bygone era when it doesn’t reckon with the present reality of far-right rallies in the street? Organizations who celebrate it should not be reassured with the non-confrontational words of hidden discrimination and awareness of “microaggressions”, but challenged by the dangers that affect everyone if opposition to discrimination is not treated with importance. In short, Black History Month should be made current, pressing, and adaptive. Maybe an entire name rebrand is in order – Present-Day African Heritage Celebration.